this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
78 points (65.1% liked)
Memes
45560 readers
836 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Go ahead then. Explain the difference without making shit up.
I guess the Israeli far right preferred Trump for no reason.
Notice how you didn't actually give a reason?
Do you really need me to Google for you why the Golan Heights president is likely a worse outcome for the citizens of Gaza?
Fine, how about his commitment to arm Israel with no strings attached? No humanitarian aid, no cease fires...
Anyone who thinks the Muslim-ban president is a good outcome for Gaza only cares about the real estate value of Gaza.
Oh you mean exactly like right now?
Anyone who thinks that orange man is an improvement is an idiot. But anyone who thinks Kamala would be better is also an idiot.
Israel is already getting everything they could ever wish for. There is nothing that Trump could offer that they're not already getting, including protection from the international community.
Oh wow Trump put the name on the map! Israel already illegally occupied the place and Genocided Palestinians for decades, but Trump but officially recognized it!!! (ignore israeli mass annexation and murder in the West bank the last year too)
When Netanyahu finishes ethnically cleansing Gaza under the Genocide Joe administration and starts building settlements, I will say 'no biggie'. Who cares about those millions of Palestinians undergoing a Holocaust.
The only thing that matters is when Donald J Trump officially moves the little border line on the American map. Because israel ethnically cleansing and annexxing the place under the Democrats is irrelevant.
The AIPAC donations in the primary went to Nikki Hailey. Trump started receiving his cheques after he defeated her.
Is he in their pocket now? Of course. But he was not their preferred pick.
Why wouldn't they? You made yourself fascists by chasing him but that doesn't change the fact that he was there before you. Of course they prefer him. Just like the American fascist voters you failed to swing.
Being a loser doesn't absolve you.
One mostly exports the genocide to the third world
The other wants to bring it home.
Task: Failed
Now, now. They made a distinction. It was just between the value of white lives and brown lives.
Of course, ignore all the rhetoric of trump and is ilk so you can call the other guy racist. That certainly seals the argument
Please take a step back, take a few breaths, and try to be coherent to the context you're replying.
If I were you I would either recant my position or be VERY offended that I was accused with merit of being a white supremacist. You singled out as a distinction that the bad things would happen here. To people like you. Fairly explicit that should mean something more than the lives that aren't yours.
This is definitional chauvinism.
Wanna take another crack at replying now?
What is there to be more coherent about? You boiled down that guy's response to be about skin color
It was.
if that's the only thing you noticed, then who's the one being racist here?
Just for context, you're a white supremacist trump supporter type, right? That's how you envision yourself?
Because I've literally never heard the "pointing out racism is the real racism" line save from them.
never was. cant support the pos even before P2025 made the news. being pan and fucking lebanese, there's virtually nothing about the guy that i would be willing to support, short of dying of stress and old age before he can take over again.
racism is present in all parts of the political spectrum, but I guess its hard to tell when you only see the world in black and white.
by the way, your elitist tone is pretty annoying
If you don't want to be talked down to, get out of the gutter.
nice comeback, think up that one yourself? since you didn't really respond to the rest of my comment, i'm assuming you couldn't reason yourself to a proper rebuttal.
Tit for tat. You responded to nothing I said this entire time. I'm supposed to respond to your comment that ignored my criticism of what you said by turning the conversation to who you are?
Fuck off.
Back to you, shithead.
do i really have to draw the lines between my responses and yours?
This is interesting as you seemed to do some impressive mental gymnastics to claim i was a skinhead or something. i didn't respond to it because I had no idea how my first comment suggested i was racist. and, knowing how you probably think, wanna use this rhetoric to somehow prove that I am
talking about your hasty conclusion to Regal's claim which brings up 1st and 3rd world countries without mentioning skin color. that dude said absolutely nothing about race.
I already told you I'm not, and went into further detail into why, including bringing my own race into record since you seem to be quick to judge things based on race
and how does this respond to anything else in the parent comment other than the very last line, which seems to have touched a nerve?
so, as it seems you're getting a bit heated, imma suggest you do what you told me to do earlier
why would you waste your time typing all of that out to a critical audience? You said absolutely fucking nothing and filled a page with it.
vapid smarm
REDUNDANT vapid smarm
Literally the first fractional piece of actual content in your post. And all it did was name the subject.
Then either ask or shut the fuck up? Do you need to be taught how to talk to people in the first place??
All this boiled down to was "lol I didn't reply because I didn't want to"
So okay? Can we acknowledge that you're being a giant piece of shit and move on?
Trump racist trope: "It's not racist, it's another country!"
Trump racist trope: "Lol you responded to a thing I said therefore TRIGGERED"
I resent having ever met you. You're an unalloyed detriment.
wow you got mad! comparing me to trump really shows off your insecurities. are you actually trying to lead us to believe every American has a Caucasian background? Seriously? Because that's exactly what you're implying in the following statement:
...in response to:
What else could this mean? Someone from a specific country doesn't mean they have a specific skin color. Aren't there other marginalized groups to consider? for instance, the LGBT groups that far-right wingers have been antagonizing here in the US? Maybe its just me, but LGBT groups aren't defined by their skin color or race.
I'm fully aware I'm a piece of shit, but its only because its too easy to point out your oversimplified and flawed logic to get you ticked off for being unable to properly argue your point. man, its like its your first time on the internet.
Now, I will stand by my argument that what you said was reductive and at least a tad racist. Before you rage and reply back pointless insults and comparisons, do me a favor and send this comment chain to someone with a clear head.
Edit: actually, don't bother. This was a good way for me to vent my frustrations on the internet after this shit election, but I'm tired now and do not have the energy to argue with child-like logic anymore. Some day, you'll mature enough to understand how the world works. in the meantime, i'm just gonna ignore the next however many replies you need to send to feel better about yourself. sayonara!
deranged
You only have yourself to blame for me rolling my eyes and not reading the several paragraphs you put after this you presumably had some investment in writing.
Person A wants to kill 1 million people.
Person B wants to kill 50 million people.
You: "what's a trolley?"
The delusion you're suffering is evidenced by the fact you think those numbers are different
He's right if 1 white person counts for 50 brown people