this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
1086 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

58137 readers
4359 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1086
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

"Muso, a research firm that studies piracy, concluded that the high prices of streaming services like Spotify and Apple Music are pushing people back towards illegal downloads. Spotify raised its prices by one dollar last year to $10.99 a month, the same price as Apple Music. Instead of coughing up $132 a year, more consumers are using websites that rip audio straight out of YouTube videos, and convert them into downloadable MP3 or .wav files.

Roughly 40% of the music piracy Muso tracked was from these “YouTube-to-MP3” sites. The original YouTube-to-MP3 site died from a record label lawsuit, but other copycats do the same thing. A simple Google search yields dozens of blue links to these sites, and they’re, by far, the largest form of audio piracy on the internet."

The problem isn't price. People just don't want to pay for a bad experience. What Apple Music and Spotify have in common is that their software is bloated with useless shit and endlessly annoying user-hostile design. Plus Steve Jobs himself said it back in 2007: "people want to own their music." Having it, organizing it, curating it is half the fun. Not fun is pressing play one day and finding a big chunk of your carefully constructed playlist is "no longer in your library." Screw that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 60 points 7 months ago (35 children)

I wish we had Google Play Music again. It really was an excellent app and had flawless suggestions for me I always enjoyed, and truly the most intuitive mixes. Google is evil of course, but honestly one of the best features was the listing of bands playing near you in the upcoming weeks, I went to so many shows because I'd try their music via the GPM suggestions.

I listen to the Henry Rollins show on KCRW to try to get into new music but despite my appreciation of him I find his music tastes repetitive. How many weeks in a row can I listen to the Jesus and Mary Chain?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (7 children)

I used to use Google Play music back in the day. It was also nice to upload your own music and then be able to stream it anywhere.

Now I use Plex with Plexamp which works almost as well.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Plex is not great for privacy or ownership these days. Jellyfin or Kodi are much better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Does their music player compare to Plexamp at all?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Best alternative to plexamp I've found is Symfonium. It supports plex, jellyfin, subsonic and possibly others.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Oh my god you've literally just recommended me a dream app. PlexAmp has so many annoying usability issues and symfonium seems to have solved all of them, I can't thank you enough.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Just what I've been looking for, it supports offline playing!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)